Skate park bust nets 13 without helmets
by Nick Rappley | Patterson Irrigator
Sep 28, 2011 | 3144 views | 13 13 comments | 25 25 recommendations | email to a friend | print
09-27-11--Area youth are ticketed by Patterson Sheriff's deputies after being warned the previous day for not wearing a protective helmet while skating in the park.--photo by Elias Funez/Patterson Irrigator
view slideshow (5 images)
Patterson police handed out 13 skate park citations during a sweep to catch rules violators Tuesday, Sept. 27.

The skateboarders, most of whom were cited for not wearing helmets, can avoid a fine by taking a city class and staying out of the park for 12 weeks.

Patterson Police Services received an anonymous call just after 2:30 p.m. Tuesday notifying police that several people in the new Patterson Skate Park were skating without helmets, Sgt. John Walker said.

When deputies arrived, they counted more than 20 skaters without helmets and chased after a trio leaving the park toward the nearby McDonald’s restaurant at Ward and Sperry avenues, he said. After they wrote citations for those skateboarders, they returned to the skate park to write another 10 citations for the remaining skaters for failing to use helmets.

Outside of two diversion citations written to two skaters who got into a fight a week ago, this is the first time that citations have been handed out since the skate park reopened Sept. 16, Walker said. Police have been stopping by routinely to remind skaters to use their helmets, he said.

All skaters, regardless of age, must wear helmets inside the park, according to Patterson Municipal Code. Violators cited by police are placed into a mandatory diversion program that carries a 12-week suspension from the park and requires a class administered by the Patterson Chief of Police to be completed. Failure to complete the diversion program can result in a suspension from the park for one year. A second violation of park rules including helmet use can carry a $100 fine and a third or more carries a $250 fine.

Walker said there is no excuse for not wearing a helmet, as Patterson’s Parks and Recreation Department has more than 100 helmets on hand to be checked out from the Hammon Senior Center across the parking lot in the same complex.

Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
GoGiants123
|
October 12, 2011
As I went by this evening, there were only 7 users of the skatepark, and as one would expect, not a single helmet.

I guess what everyone is wondering is this: Is the city going to enforce the rules? Was the money wasted on the video equipment? And, why in the world did they close the park if they have no intentions of enforcing the rules they did put in place.

When the first lawsuit comes, and with the documented lack of enforcement of the rules, it will, we, the citizens of Patterson will be on the hook for a lot of money.

In order to cut the chances of that happening, the city NEEDS TO ENFORCE THE RULES!!

The city has set the precedence that the rules don't mean a thing and when a lawsuit comes about, they won't be able to claim there were rules in place.

Way to go city management, put our money at risk yet again. Thanks Annette.

ObserverOfObservers
|
October 12, 2011
No I agree with you both. Just clarifying that they are not City workers.
tigers1997
|
October 12, 2011
OoO, are you telling us that since the paramedics don't work for the city, it is still OK for the kids to skate without helmets, or are you saying that in Patterson, the paramedic that focus on public safety should not meddle in safety issues within the city limits?

It doesn't matter who they work for, public safety officials should be looking after the safety of all individuals.

There are quite a few people who are curious how much was spent opn the video equipment since it isn't being used. There are kids, and adults, out there every night, skating without helmets. EVERY NIGHT.

The complaint that everyone has is that the city created a set of rules without even thinking about enforcing them. WHy spend the money on video surveillance if there is absolutely no intent to use it. It is just another example of the waste and abuse that those in power continue to commit.

The park was closed for a period of time because it was rushed through without proper planning. The planning was done, the rules created, only to open without any actual plans for enforcing the rules.

We can't wait to see how you bungle the plans for the teen center.

Cuellar.Sergio
|
October 12, 2011
OoO- Point is the city spent money on these cameras, and nothing is being enforced! lol Right Wing Theme Song: Stand by your man!..in this case your councilwoman! lol

Funnier every time you post!
ObserverOfObservers
|
October 10, 2011
"theres even a video of what appears to be fireman eating ice cream while watching the skaters with no helmets on.

http://youtu.be/uR7q5J6RleU

If city workers wont even enforce the rules then its pretty obvious that we were lied to about this entire project, its rules and who knows what else. Oh well what did you expect?"

Actually those are paramedics and they do not work for the City.

So_far_underwater_its_a_joke
|
October 10, 2011
Do the video cameras work or are they fake? In fact thanks to youtube why did patterson even spend money on video equipment when the kids will post everything anyways?

http://youtu.be/rxTM7NdJkcY

http://youtu.be/EM8RHv1ytBw

theres even a video of what appears to be fireman eating ice cream while watching the skaters with no helmets on.

http://youtu.be/uR7q5J6RleU

If city workers wont even enforce the rules then its pretty obvious that we were lied to about this entire project, its rules and who knows what else. Oh well what did you expect?
tigers1997
|
October 10, 2011
I would have to suggest that the message isn't reaching anyone.

Friday evening at about 8:45PM, there were 10 skaters with zero helments. Saturday evening, at about 9:00PM, 8 skaters with zero helmets. Last night, Sunday, 12 skaters, one little girl with her daddy, and one pogo-stick kid, all without helmets. The little girl, as she was riding her skateboard without a helmet was proud of her riding skills as she yelled "Look daddy, I am skateboarding."

Also witnessed at least one of the cited kids, still riding without a helmet and not at all absent from the park for 12 weeks.

Were the safety rules created just for pretend, so that those in power could claim that they did their job? Even if it was just lip service and they have no intention of enforcement? One visit by the police doesn't show any desire to enforce the rules.

What is the city going to do when they are hit with a big lawsuit when a kid is seriously hurt? They won't be able to wash their hands of the law by saying that everyong that skates does so on their own accord. Not if they don't enforce the rules that are in place. A few cities have lost those lawsuits, because they didn't enforce the rules.

Mom2skaters
|
October 07, 2011
Helmets should be worn, the law enforced, and anyone that has had kids knows that they don't always do what they should or what you want them too. As a mom of a skateboarder who skates Patterson skatepark(we are from Modesto) who unfortunately carries his helmet with him, and doesn't always wear it....I believe the kids should be ticketed, and I love the idea of the class they need to attend, but I don't agree with keeping them out of the park for 12 weeks. If something is your passion, skating, dance, photography, etc.....that is a pretty harsh punishment, not being able to do the thing they love. If these kids can't skate at the park, they will skate everywhere else. Remember this, they are kids, whether 10 or 17.....I think we all need to remember when we were kids.

Common sense needs to prevail.
aeh4543
|
October 01, 2011
Where are the sheriff deputies when my neighbors are blasting their stereo at 1 am? It should not take multiple calls to get them to shut the hell up!
artjedi
|
September 30, 2011
So we have people complain about the skateboarders not wearing helmets and nobody enforcing the law, and we have people complain about cops enforcing the law for them not wearing helmets... huh???
redmt
|
September 29, 2011
It's all about numbers and CYA. The SO needs to post up numbers to prove they actually are doing something and the city needs to cover their butts for lawsuits. Hey, best of both worlds. 20 citations issued for hardened grammar school future gangsters and the City council sees something being done.
shleprock
|
September 28, 2011
Yeah lets give out citations for no helmets , lets give out fix it tickets for no front license plates,but lets not do anything about whats really going on in this town , gang activity, drugs, robberies. I have lived in this town 25 yrs and it has become another Oakland,Stockton,Fresno and all the other low life cities in California.
redmt
|
September 28, 2011
I'm feeling so much safer that the offenders are off the street. Too bad they can't put as much effort into the gang problems. Maybe the plan was to catch all the gang members without helmets?


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at news@pattersonirrigator.com.