Grand jury suits moving along
by Nick Rappley | Patterson Irrigator
Feb 01, 2012 | 6634 views | 7 7 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Annette Smith
Annette Smith
slideshow
George Logan
George Logan
slideshow
A federal judge has granted Stanislaus County’s motion to dismiss a federal lawsuit filed against it by Annette Smith, but the Patterson city councilwoman said she would stand her ground.

Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill ruled this week in Sacramento that Smith’s original court documents were too vague and insufficient. Smith has 30 days, until Feb. 24, to amend her complaint and provide more details.

She said this week that she was comfortable with the judge’s ruling.

“I looked at the judge’s order. He wants me to add some meat to my claims,” she said. “I have no problem doing that. I am absolutely confident going back and adding meat.”

The original complaint for damages — filed in U.S. District Federal Court in Sacramento against the County of Stanislaus and as many as 20 unidentified defendants — sought an injunction against the grand jury to stop further alleged abuse of authority and publication of transcripts from the investigation. The suit also called for the jury to revise its findings and sought unspecified damages and attorney fees.

Smith claimed in the suit that her rights as a citizen were violated.

Logan’s case delayed until April

A hearing Friday, Jan. 27, in the civil contempt case against former Patterson City Attorney George Logan was postponed until April 3 in Stanislaus Superior Court because of four motions he filed.

Logan has recently filed motions in addition to asking for a continuance to unseal court documents, which he says he has not been able to review.

He also filed an affidavit of prejudice alleging the entire county judiciary is biased against him, and has requested change of venue. Judge William Mayhew will make a decision April 3 on these motions.

“I think we need to get some fresh eyes on this issue,” Logan said last month.

The civil grand jury is seeking a contempt-of-court charge against Logan for speaking and writing in local newspapers last spring about his testimony in front of the grand jury during an investigation into Patterson City Council dealings. If he were found in contempt, the charge could carry a $1,000 fine or possible jail time, as well as court costs and opposing counsel’s attorney fees.

An affidavit signed by former Grand Jury Foreman Denis France accused Logan of violating an oath and admonition to secrecy, as well as insulting the grand jury.

Logan has cited previous court cases in arguing that he was not legally bound to secrecy, because there was no clear and present danger to the jury’s proceedings.

Logan said after the hearing Friday that he expected his case to be moved to a judge outside of the county.

Nick Rappley can be reached at 892-6187 or nick@pattersonirrigator.com.

Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ObserverOfObservers
|
February 06, 2012
I believe it was said on here before as a letter to the editor...Where are the children's parents with regards to the Skate Park?? They need to step up in their kids lives and instruct them that they need to be following the rules. It is not the Mayor's or any Councilmember's job to make sure the kids that use that Skate Park are wearing helmets!
mysensorycortex
|
February 08, 2012
What do any of my questions have to do with the skate park? Its a shame that anytime something valid is asked....it gets glanced over!!!! Maybe I should add some more accusations to my post then it would get answered. I am just curious how this is whats best for the city of Patterson. Was anyone else astounded by the amount of city $$ that has been spent on court costs revolving around this council? It is absolutely absurd for a town of our size. If this makes sense....then tell us about it in a logical manner.
ObserverOfObservers
|
February 10, 2012
The skate park comment was in regards to the score card posted below.
Cuellar.Sergio
|
February 11, 2012
"They need to step up in their kids lives and instruct them that they need to be following the rules"...Dont rules usually come with some consequence, some violation, some reprimand for breaking such rules? Why have or create rules or codes if you have no way to enforce them.

And when you are responsible for the city and the liability that comes with building a skate park, or any park in general, you are responsible for creating and assuring that rules are being followed and monitored!
mysensorycortex
|
February 02, 2012
This is a public forum, and you are a public official. There is certainly nothing wrong with addressing some of the concerns that many of pattersons residents seem to have. Which I don't see ever happen either here or on Facebook. That makes me wonder if you are convinced yourself that this is 100% the right thing to do. It would be great if we could get some sort of response as to what your point of view is and why it seems that so much of our public officials time is wasted on addressing scandals or accusations(whether true or false) At some point this has to stop and our focus needs to be re-directed to the pressing issues that are in front of Patterson(rather that personal issues that are behind Patterson)
mysensorycortex
|
February 02, 2012
Reading things like this its no wonder why our state is in debt! Quit wasting the courts time and money.....this is a JOKE!!!!!!!! Annette, if you are listening, pleas convince us(the public) why this nonsense needs to continue? Will the ends justify the means? I feel like everytime a logical question is posted it gets dodged or ignored. I am trying to remember the last time I read and article with your name included that was not focused around some sort of personal agenda or accusations from either side that are really not related to improving our cities well being. So again I ask.....is this whats best for Patterson? Is this what you were elected to do? And isn't it time our city officials put personal issues aside and work together on improving this city. Differing view points is what makes our gov't special! However lets not put up blinders to what is best for the city that you are representing. Its time to focus on city issues, not personal ones.
Cuellar.Sergio
|
February 01, 2012
Annette Smiths Score Card:

2010 Election: Fail

Grand Jury Suit: Fail

Appeal to Grand Jury to oust Mayor molina: Fail

Community Support: Failing

Skate Park completion: Successs

Skate Park code enforcement: Fail

Wasting Tax Payer Money: Success

Super Wal-Mart: Success

Not a good record! Is she spent as much time working with the community as she has pushing her own agenda and looking crazy trying everything possible to take out the mayor and his supporters she could probably do amazing things

so sad



We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at news@pattersonirrigator.com.