October 6, 2008 Patterson, CA

Search

Polls

How will you vote on Measure V, the school bond measure?
 

Latest Forum Posts

Re:Football
unclebuck 02-10-08 12:59
Re:Football
adr5ram4 26-09-08 00:41
Re:Football
unclebuck 18-09-08 17:51

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
His Voice Print E-mail
Written by Earl Hiatt / Community Columnist   
Friday, 20 June 2008

An un-memorial day


Bereaved relatives visit gravesites of loved ones. Patriotic citizens wave flags and attend parades. Vote-seeking politicians wax eloquent about sacrifices made on behalf of freedom.

Image
Earl Hiatt / His Voice
Year in and year out, there is a tragic consistency to Memorial Day, commemorated last month.

President Bush said: “Today, we mourn and remember all those who have given their lives in the line of duty.”

And mourn we should, especially because virtually nothing President Bush — or any of his predecessors — said was true.

Courageous men and women have died, and most thought they were defending liberty and the United States. But only rarely have U.S. wars had anything to do with the nation’s defense, let alone the promotion of liberty, here or abroad.

That is a tough message to swallow, for many good soldiers have died bravely and honorably for bad or unjust causes.

What follows is a short review of some of our wars and their relationship to our nation’s defense or the promotion of liberty:

President James Polk started the Mexican-American War by sending U.S. soldiers into Mexican territory and then claiming that Mexico had committed aggression by attacking our force. Our goal was not to promote liberty but to seize Mexican territory, which we accomplished by taking almost half of the country.

The Spanish-American War was supposedly started to save Cuban people from Spanish oppression, but our true goal was to drive Spain out of the Philippines, as we needed a coaling station in the Western Pacific for our commercial ships. It took 10 years and 200,000 Filipino lives before the Filipinos had their freedom (our version).

World War I was one of humanity’s greatest tragedies, an utterly unsuccessful conflict. Our irrational President Woodrow Wilson thought we could “make the world safe for democracy.” The result was the slaughter of millions, destruction of constitutional liberties, destruction of social orders and dissolution of countries across Europe. The vengeful peace treaty that followed was not only a primary cause of Communism, fascism and Nazism, but the primary cause of World War II.

In that war, we were told that we were fighting against dictators and for freedom, but Stalin, one of the cruelest despots of all times, was our ally. Millions of people were killed by the Soviet Union after World War II was over. And we were fighting for freedom?

We were told the Vietnam War was necessary to defend the U.S. and the free world. We lost 58,000 servicemen, proving that the previous sentence was not true and, like most always, our leaders had lied to us. Much later in life, then-Defense Secretary Robert McNamara admitted that he had lied to the American people. When asked why, he said, “My president asked me to.” Now that’s a freedom worth 58,000 lives.
There are many more wars and lies, but I’ve run out of space.

But Memorial Day should be a time to challenge incompetent politicians for wasting our courage on dubious, even disputable ends. Most foreign meddling is counterproductive.

Most U.S. wars have been unnecessary and imprudent, and some (like the present) have been brazenly immoral. The best way to honor those who have sacrificed their lives in the past would be to change U.S. policy in the future.

  • Patterson resident Earl Hiatt is a semi-retired agri-businessman whose major interests are nutrition, economics and religion. His columns appear occasionally on the Irrigator Voice page. His e-mail is This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Comments (2)add
Damn right!
written by Chris C. , June 24, 2008
Earl, I can't agree with you more. Excellent job.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
front men
written by we've been d**ked by cheney , June 27, 2008
in the front stands prez bush,but who i have my eye on is d**k cheney, his crafty attorney, and ms.rice. cheney is a good ol boy from the nixon era and has old scores to settle!he served under nixon,ford,regan,and the 1st prez bush.
g.w bushes cabinet has a higher turn over rate then hot dog on a stick!

i question anybody(d**k cheney) who is still recieving their "golden parachute" payouts as the former c.e.o from a company(kbr/halliburton) that is basiclly providing any and all services to the military.
but what sickens me is how he is all ready to engage in war, take tax payers money and fund the war, then his old company that is still paying him is making hand over fist profits! what is interesting is how he was all for the Vietnam war but applied for 5 deferments stating "he had higher priorites." guess a war only worth fighting for is if you can profit from!
so my other war to pick with him is this whole anti-abortion idea he has.
so let me get this straight d**k cheney opposes abortion, votes against federal funding for abortion(even in rape and incest situations)but he believes in the persons right to bare arms.believes in war for other people to fight and die.so i see it as don't terminate a being in the womb wait until d**k cheney can falsify a war a let the war terminate the being.let it make a few bucks first in medicare tax,ssi tax,maybe property tax,income tax,sales tax,and gas tax.not to mention we may be in iraq for 100 yrs and the being can drink coke eat pizza and then kbr can charge the gov oodles of money for there services.
so what is iraq really about?!!! sadam did not bring the towers down and he was not charging us an arm and a leg for gas!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy